Google Removed FAQ Rich Results: What to Do With Your FAQ Markup
Google stopped showing FAQ rich results on 7 May 2026. See the timeline, whether to keep your markup and how to write FAQs that still earn their place.
- Read time
- 17 min read
- Sections
- 23
- FAQs answered
- 15
- Topic
- SEO
Google stopped showing FAQ rich results in Search from 7 May 2026 and has since removed the feature's documentation. FAQ sections are still worth having for visitors, and FAQPage markup is not harmful, but you should no longer expect expandable questions under your search listing. Here is what changed, what to do with existing markup and how to plan FAQ content now.
FAQ markup had a long run as one of the easiest ways to take up more space on the results page. If your site used it, you may have noticed the change in your listings. This article explains the timeline from Google's own documentation changelog, what it means for your pages and what we recommend you do next. For the general approach to answer-focused writing, see our answer engine optimization guide.
What changed, and when
Google's Search Central documentation changelog records the sequence.
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 8 May 2026 (changelog entry) | Google added a deprecation notice to the FAQ rich result documentation, stating that the feature would no longer appear in Google Search starting 7 May 2026 |
| 12 June 2026 | Google removed the documentation for the FAQ rich result feature, because it is no longer shown in Search results |
This was not a sudden surprise. Google had already restricted FAQ rich results in 2023 to well-known, authoritative government and health sites, which meant most businesses had stopped seeing them. The 2026 change ended the feature altogether. Source: Google Search Central, documentation updates.
What it means for your search listings
- No FAQ dropdowns. Your result will not show expandable questions beneath it, even if the page has valid FAQPage markup.
- Possible small changes in click-through rate. If you saw rich results before, your listing now takes less space. Check Search Console for pages whose click-through rate changed, and compare against similar pages without FAQ markup.
- Rankings are not affected by the change itself. Google described this as removing a display feature. It does not say pages with FAQ markup rank lower.
- Your visible FAQs still work for visitors. The content on the page is unchanged.
Should you remove your FAQ markup?
Not necessarily. There is no sign that valid FAQPage markup harms a page, and structured data can still help systems understand a page's content. But the main benefit, the rich result, is gone, so the decision is practical.
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Markup is valid and matches the visible questions | Leave it. It does no harm, and removing it takes effort for no clear gain |
| Markup is broken, duplicated or does not match the page | Fix or remove it. Google's structured data policies require markup to match visible content |
| You added hidden FAQ markup for ranking | Remove it |
| A template adds FAQ markup to every page automatically | Limit it to pages that really have FAQs, and stop generating filler |
| You are building new pages | Do not add FAQ markup just for search. Write the FAQ for readers, and add markup only if it is easy and accurate |
We have kept FAQPage markup on our own blog posts for the moment, because it matches the visible questions and costs nothing to maintain. We do not expect a rich result from it.
Do FAQ sections still have value?
Yes, for three reasons.
- They help readers. A visitor with one specific doubt, such as "do you cover my area?", can find the answer without reading the whole page.
- They match how people search. Questions are how people phrase searches, and a clear question with a direct answer is useful on its own.
- They can support answer features. Writing a short, direct answer under a question gives search engines and AI tools a clean passage, although Google says you do not need to write in a special way for AI.
The difference is that FAQs are now a content tool, not a markup tactic. Put them where they help the reader, and make them real.
How to write an FAQ section that earns its place
- Use real questions. Pull them from customer emails, sales calls, reviews and Search Console queries. Skip questions that nobody asks.
- Answer first. Start with the direct answer in the first sentence, then add the condition or detail.
- Keep answers short but complete. One to four sentences is usually right. Link to a fuller page where more depth helps.
- Avoid "it depends" without saying on what. Name the factors.
- Do not repeat the same answer in different words. Each question should cover something distinct.
- Keep it honest and current. Update prices, dates and policies when they change.
- Place it where people look. On a service page, put the questions that stop a purchase near the call to action. On a guide, put them at the end.
- Do not stuff keywords. A question that reads as if written for a search engine will not help anyone.
What about structured data more widely?
The FAQ change is a reminder that structured data features come and go. Some points to keep in mind.
- Markup must match the visible page. Google's policies require it, and mismatches can cost you eligibility for rich features.
- Use markup for features that exist. Check Google's list of supported features before investing time.
- Do not chase every format. Focus on markup that clarifies who you are and what you offer, such as Organization, LocalBusiness, Product, Article and BreadcrumbList.
- Not required for AI features. Google says structured data is not required for its generative AI features and there is no special markup for them.
Our schema services follow this approach: add markup that is accurate, supported and useful, and remove what is not.
A checklist for your FAQ content and markup
| Check | Why |
|---|---|
| List pages that carry FAQPage markup | Know what you have before deciding anything |
| Confirm each question and answer is visible on the page | Required by Google's structured data policies |
| Remove markup on pages where the FAQ is hidden, duplicated or empty | Avoids policy problems |
| Check Search Console for pages whose click-through rate changed | See whether the change affected you |
| Rewrite thin or repetitive FAQs | Make them useful to readers |
| Add FAQs to pages where visitors have clear questions | Support conversions |
| Update the date and facts when policies or prices change | Keep answers trustworthy |
Measuring the effect on your own site
- In Search Console, open the Performance report and filter by pages that had FAQ markup.
- Compare click-through rate and clicks for the weeks before 7 May 2026 and the weeks after, taking account of seasonality and ranking changes.
- Compare against pages without FAQ markup to separate the effect of the feature's removal from general trends.
- Check whether impressions or positions moved. If they did not, the change is probably about display, not ranking.
Look at conversions as well as clicks. A page that loses a few clicks but converts better because it is clearer may be doing well overall.
FAQ content and AI answers
Because AI answers draw on passages from pages, clear question-and-answer sections can supply passages that are easy to use. Google's guide to its generative AI features says you do not need to write in a special way for AI, chunk your content or rely on special markup. It also says to focus on unique, non-commodity content. So an FAQ that simply restates common knowledge adds little. An FAQ that shares your real experience, such as the actual timeline and costs of your work, adds more. See our guide to Google AI Overviews optimization for details.
Mistakes to avoid after the change
- Deleting all your FAQs because the rich result is gone.
- Keeping markup that no longer matches the page after you edit the visible text.
- Generating dozens of low-quality questions per page.
- Assuming your rankings fell because of the markup, without checking other causes.
- Paying for a tool or service that sells "FAQ schema" as a ranking fix.
A worked example: auditing FAQ markup on a 200-page site
This is an invented example. A Leeds software company added FAQPage markup to 80 pages in 2023, hoping for rich results. After the May 2026 change, it wants to know what to do.
Step 1: Find the pages
It crawls the site with a crawler configured to extract JSON-LD, and exports a list of pages that contain FAQPage markup, with the number of questions in each.
Step 2: Compare markup with visible text
For each page, a team member checks that every question and answer in the markup appears visibly on the page, in the same words. The check finds three problems: 12 pages where the visible FAQ was edited but the markup was not, 9 pages where a template generated the same five questions regardless of the topic, and 4 pages where the FAQ was hidden in a collapsed section that loaded only after a click.
Step 3: Decide page by page
| Group | Pages | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Valid markup, matches visible text, real questions | 55 | Leave |
| Markup out of date compared with visible text | 12 | Update the markup, or generate it from the same source as the visible text |
| Template FAQs that repeat across unrelated pages | 9 | Remove the markup, and rewrite or delete the generic questions |
| Hidden or click-only FAQ content | 4 | Make the text visible or remove the markup |
Step 4: Check performance
In Search Console, the team compares click-through rate for the 80 pages in the eight weeks before and after 7 May 2026, against 80 similar pages without markup. Click-through rate falls slightly on the marked-up pages, but impressions and positions are unchanged. The team concludes it is a display change, and moves on to improving the questions themselves.
Step 5: Improve the content
For the ten most visited pages, the team interviews support staff, replaces generic questions with real ones from tickets and adds direct answers with links to documentation. Support tickets about those topics fall over the next quarter, which is a more valuable result than a rich result would have been.
FAQ patterns that help, and patterns that hurt
| Helpful | Unhelpful |
|---|---|
| Questions taken from real customers | Questions invented to include keywords |
| Direct answer in the first sentence | Long preamble before the answer |
| Short answers that link to deeper pages | Walls of text hidden in accordions |
| Different questions that cover different doubts | The same question phrased five ways |
| Facts with dates and sources | Vague claims with no support |
| Placed near the decision point | Dumped at the bottom of every page |
| Updated when facts change | Left unchanged for years |
Which structured data is worth the effort now
Google's documentation lists the structured data features it supports and the policies behind them. The FAQ change is a good moment to review what you use and why.
| Type | Typical use | Worth it when |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Describes your business, logo and profiles | Always, on the home page, if details are accurate. See our entity SEO guide |
| LocalBusiness | Name, address, phone and hours for a physical business | You serve a location. See our local SEO checklist |
| Product and Offer | Product details, price and availability | You sell products and want eligibility for product features |
| Article | Headline, author and dates for articles | You publish editorial content and want to give clear authorship and date signals |
| BreadcrumbList | Shows page hierarchy | Your site has a clear hierarchy |
| VideoObject | Describes videos on your pages | You host videos and want them found. See our YouTube SEO guide |
| Review snippets | Ratings from genuine reviews | You have real reviews and follow Google's review guidelines, including the July 2026 guideline on fake and undisclosed incentivised reviews |
For every type, the markup must match the visible page. If you are not sure, validate with Google's Rich Results Test, and remember that it only tests whether markup is valid, not whether it will earn a feature.
FAQ pages versus FAQ sections
Some sites built a single large FAQ page. That can help people who search for a question, but there is a risk: a page covering dozens of unrelated questions rarely matches a single search intent well. Often it is better to place each question on the page that owns its topic, and link to it from a short central index if you want one. Questions about pricing belong on the pricing page, questions about delivery on the delivery page. This also avoids two pages answering the same question, which causes cannibalization. See our keyword research guide.
A simple template for each FAQ entry
| Part | Guidance | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Question | The words a customer would use | Do you offer fixed-price quotes? |
| Direct answer | Yes or no, or the main fact, in the first sentence | Yes, for most projects under 20 days of work. |
| Condition | What changes the answer | Larger or less defined projects are quoted in stages. |
| Next step | A link or action | Request a quote using the form below. |
| Owner and date | Internal: who checks it and when | Sales lead, reviewed each January |
A short history of FAQ rich results
| Time | What happened |
|---|---|
| Around 2019 | Google introduced FAQ rich results, which let sites with FAQPage markup show expandable questions under their listing |
| August 2023 | Google reduced the feature so that FAQ rich results were shown mainly for well-known, authoritative government and health sites, as announced at the time |
| 8 May 2026 | Google's documentation added a deprecation notice. The feature stopped appearing from 7 May 2026 |
| 12 June 2026 | The feature's documentation was removed |
The 2019 and 2023 entries are from our memory of Google's public announcements at the time and are included for context. The 2026 entries come from the Search Central documentation changelog. For official details of any date, check Google's documentation.
FAQ questions that suit different types of page
| Page type | Useful questions |
|---|---|
| Service page | How much does it cost? How long does it take? What do you need from me? What is included? What if I am not happy? |
| Product page | What size should I choose? Is it compatible with X? What is the delivery time? How do I return it? How do I care for it? |
| Location page | Do you cover my area? Where do I park? What are your opening hours? Do you offer evening appointments? |
| Pricing page | What is included in each plan? Can I change plans? Is there a contract? What are the extra costs? |
| Guide or article | Short follow-ups that readers often have after reading, such as what to do next or common mistakes |
| Software documentation | Troubleshooting questions, limits and how-to steps |
Accessibility for FAQ sections
- If you use expandable sections, make sure they work with keyboard navigation and screen readers, and that the content is present in the page, not loaded only after a click.
- Use headings for questions so people can navigate by headings.
- Keep answers readable, with clear language.
- Avoid hiding essential information, such as pricing conditions, inside collapsed sections without a visible hint.
Glossary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Rich result | A search listing enhanced with extra visual or interactive elements, powered by structured data |
| FAQPage | A schema.org type for a page of questions and answers. Google no longer shows an FAQ rich result |
| JSON-LD | A common format for adding structured data to a page |
| Deprecation | Announcing that a feature will stop being supported or shown |
| Rich Results Test | Google's tool for checking whether markup is valid and eligible for supported features |
| Changelog | The dated list of documentation updates published by Google Search Central |
Checklist when Google changes a structured data feature
- Read the changelog entry and the updated documentation, and note the dates.
- List the pages that use the affected markup.
- Check whether Search Console shows warnings or changes in related reports.
- Compare performance for those pages before and after, against a similar group.
- Decide whether to keep, fix or remove the markup, and record the reason.
- Update your documentation and templates, so new pages follow the decision.
A story of an FAQ rewrite that helped customers
This is an invented composite. A Reading company that installs home electric vehicle chargers had a long FAQ page with 40 questions, most of them written years earlier to catch search traffic: "What is an EV charger?", "Why should I install an EV charger?", "EV charger installation Reading" and so on. When Google ended FAQ rich results, the marketing manager decided to review the page honestly, not just to leave it alone.
She exported the questions, then listened to recordings of customer calls and read the last 100 enquiry emails. The real questions were different: "Do I need permission from my landlord?", "Can I charge if I park on the street?", "How long does installation take?", "Is there a grant I can apply for?", "What happens if my fuse board is old?", "Do you handle the paperwork for the energy supplier?" Most of the old FAQ questions did not appear at all.
She rewrote the content in three steps. First, she deleted questions that no customer had asked and that merely restated obvious information. Second, she wrote direct answers to the real questions, checking each against official guidance and her installers' experience, and she linked to official sources where rules or grants were involved. Third, she moved each question to the page where it belonged. Information about grants went to the pricing page. Parking and landlord permission went to a page for people without a driveway. Fuse board issues went to the installation process page. She kept a short list of the five most common questions on the home page, with links to the full answers.
She kept FAQPage markup on pages where the questions and answers were visible and matched. She did not expect a rich result, since Google had ended the feature, but the markup was already generated from the same content, and she did not want to spend time removing it. She also set a review date for each page, because grants and rules change, and added the last-checked date to the visible text.
The effect on rankings was unclear and she did not claim any. What she could measure was the effect on customers: calls asking the questions now answered on the site fell, and the sales team reported that people arrived better informed. Enquiry quality improved, and the share of enquiries that became installations rose. The experience reinforced the point that FAQ content works best as a service to customers, built from their real questions, and not as a tactic for search features that can disappear.
Where we can help
We are a digital marketing agency in Manchester, UK and Mumbai, India. If you want your FAQ content and structured data reviewed, our SEO audit and schema services cover it. Contact us to talk about your site.
Your questions, answered in plain English
Yes. Google's documentation changelog says the FAQ rich result feature stopped appearing in Google Search from 7 May 2026, and the feature's documentation was removed on 12 June 2026.
Google described it as ending a display feature, not as a ranking change. Check Search Console for click-through changes, but do not assume rankings fell because of the markup.
Not necessarily. Valid markup that matches visible content does no harm. Remove or fix markup that is broken, hidden or does not match the page.
Its main benefit, the FAQ rich result, is gone. It can still describe page content to systems, but do not expect a visible search feature. Write FAQs for readers first.
Yes, where visitors have real questions. FAQs help readers find answers quickly and match how people search, even without a rich result.
Clear questions with direct answers can supply easy passages, but Google says you do not need to write in a special way for AI or use special markup. Unique, helpful content matters most.
Google's structured data policies require markup to reflect content that is visible to users on the page. Hidden or mismatched FAQ markup can cause problems.
In Search Console, compare clicks and click-through rate for pages that had FAQ markup before and after 7 May 2026, and compare with similar pages without markup to account for seasonality.
As many as readers genuinely need, which is usually a handful per page. Quality and distinctness matter more than count. Avoid filler questions written to hold keywords.
Put questions that block a purchase near the call to action on service pages, and put general questions at the end of guides. Place them where readers look for answers.
No. Audit first. Keep valid markup that matches the page, and remove it only where it is wrong, hidden or created automatically for pages without real FAQs.
Markup that clarifies who you are and what you offer, such as Organization, LocalBusiness, Product, Article and BreadcrumbList, where it matches visible content and supports a Google feature.
Yes, those are separate from FAQ rich results. Google says you cannot mark a page as a featured snippet, so write clear answers with good structure and let its systems choose.
Google's changelog states the feature was deprecated and would no longer appear, without a detailed public explanation in the entries we reviewed. Focus on what you can control: useful content and accurate markup.
List pages with FAQPage markup, confirm each question and answer is visible, fix or remove mismatches, check Search Console for click-through changes and improve thin FAQs.
Still curious? Send us your question and a strategist will get back to you.
Found this useful?
Want this done for you?
Start with an audit tied to revenue. We will tell you what is worth fixing and what is not.